RICO and Organized Elder Exploitation In Your Local Probate Court

RICO and Organized Elder Exploitation: 

Your Local County Probate Mafia

Federal Court Equates Elder Guardianship to Racketeering:


“The 6th Circuit ruling confirmed my client’s right to challenge a court order, which may have been obtained through abuses of judicial processes,” said Dr. Saghafi’s attorney Chuck Longo in a telephone interview. “The decision will have far reaching negative implications for guardians and lawyers who improperly use guardianships as criminal enterprises to defraud the elderly and incompetent, which is a violation of the RICO statute.”


“Defendants APRIL PARKS, MARK SIMMONS, and GARY NEAL TAYLOR, did on or between December 21, 2011 and July 6, 2016, then and there, within Clark County, Nevada, knowingly, willfully and feloniously, while employed by or associated with an enterprise, conduct or participate either directly or indirectly, in racketeering activity through the affairs of said enterprise, and/or in the affairs of the enterprise through racketeering activity, did engage in said acts, to wit: by Defendants working for A Private Professional Guardian, LLC using their position to steal funds belonging to elderly and disabled persons over whom they had guardianship authority, through the use of a series of fraudulent billing practices, said activity constituting Racketeering contrary to NRS 207.400 (1)(c)(2).

KTNV 13 Las Vegas: The guardian is guilty: April Parks, others plead guilty in guardianship abuse case

Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (RICO) https://www.nolo.com/legal-encyclopedia/content/rico-act.html


Racketeering in Boston Probate? https://www.stopprobatefraud.com/blog/2017/08/28/racketeering-in-boston-probate/

OHIO COURTS ENFORCED FRAUD; RACKETEERING SAYS SUIT https://www.stopprobatefraud.com/blog/2019/10/27/ohio-courts-enforced-fraud-racketeering-says-suit/

Probate Courts: Criminal racketeering sanctioned by government https://ppjg.me/2011/02/20/probate-courts-criminal-racketeering-sanctioned-by-government/

Attorney: Elder “Protective Services” is a Racketeering Enterprise Medically Kidnapping Seniors https://medicalkidnap.com/2018/07/17/attorney-elder-protective-services-is-a-racketeering-enterprise-medically-kidnapping-seniors/

“The amount of abuse is crazy. You’re going against a rigged system.”

OC Register: Money-draining probate system ‘like a plague on our senior citizens’

…. often there is a little buddy-buddy system going on, sometimes a judge has friends who are attorneys,” said Thomas Coleman, a Palm Springs lawyer who specializes in representing the disabled.”


Article excerpt” “In local courts across the country — often woefully unfit for the sweeping power they command — guardians, lawyers, and expert witnesses appear frequently before the same judges in an established network of overlapping financial and professional interests. They are often paid from the estate of the person whose freedom is on the line, creating powerful incentives to form guardianships and keep them in place.

“The judge knows the lawyers, the lawyers know each other,” said J. Ronald Denman, a former state prosecutor and Florida lawyer who has contested dozens of guardianships over the past decade. “The amount of abuse is crazy. You’re going against a rigged system.”

Organized Elder Exploitation Crime Rings Devastate Entire Counties.

The Guardians: Documentary Trailer

“If you’re retired, wealthy, and thinking of moving to Las Vegas, think twice. An investigative look at the systemic abuse of elderly people by court-appointed guardians.”

Denver 7: Colorado guardianships can bleed estates with little to no oversight | “It’s a money-making machine,” says one man.

Dr. Gina Loudon Newscast on Real America’s Voice: The Silent Epidemic Preying on America’s Elderly: Bernie Kerik & Rick Black fighting estate theft

The Probate Mafia Articles


Estate Planning & Intimidation with the Local County Probate Rackets.

Rackets: Are Courts Targeting Your Family …

https://www.stopprobatefraud.com › blog › 2018 › 10 › 12 › rackets-are-courts-targeting-your-familyHave Probate Courts Become a Crime Syndicate? A Peek Via: The Economist. Originally Published: October, 2014. THE protection racket was one of the first businesses the Sicilian mafia entered into. Mafiosi have shaken down firms, large and small, on the island for over 150 years.

Unconscionability in the Law of Trusts

https://scholarship.law.nd.edu › cgi › viewcontent.cgi?article=1222&context=ndlrSee, e.g., Peter Nicolas, Fighting the Probate Mafia: A Dissection of the Probate Exception to Federal Court Jurisdiction, 74 S. CAL. L. REv. 1479, 1482 (2001). Thus, in Marshall v. Marshall, 547 U.S. 293 (2006), the United States Supreme Court clarified that the “probate exception” only forbids federal courts from hearing issues2

The Probate Mafia www.probatemafia.com. Under the Color of Law Exists an Organized Crime Industry. Public Notice to the Texas Bar; What is the ProbateMafia? The Greatest Threat to National Security is the Corruption of Justice. We-Hold-These-Truths-To-Be-Self-Evident; Search. Search for: Close search.Public Notice to The Texas Bar – TheProbate Judge – Attorney Tamorah Christine Butts Texas State Bar No.

Fighting the Probate Mafia: a Dissection of The Probate …

https://fliphtml5.com › bmca › qvtj › basic › 51-70Check Pages 51 – 70 of FIGHTING THE PROBATEMAFIA: A DISSECTION OF THE PROBATE … in the flip PDF version. FIGHTING THE PROBATEMAFIA: A DISSECTION OF THE PROBATE … was published by on 2015-05-09. Find more similar flip PDFs like FIGHTING THE PROBATEMAFIA: A DISSECTION OF THE PROBATE …. Download FIGHTING THE PROBATEMAFIA: A DISSECTION OF THE PROBATE …

Fighting the probate mafia: A dissection of the probate …

https://www.researchgate.net › publication › 265758380_Fighting_the_probate_mafia_A_dissection_of_the_probate_exception_to_federal_court_jurisdictionGiardina v. Fontana, 733 F.2d 1047, 1053 (2d Cir. 1984). See also Caminiti, 962 F.2d at 703 (noting that where the probate court lacks jurisdiction over a particular claim as against a particular …

PDF United States Court of Appeals

https://ecf.ca8.uscourts.gov › opndir › 02 › 06 › 012898P-pdfNicolas, Fighting the ProbateMafia: A Dissection of the Probate Exception to Federal Court Jurisdiction , 74 S. Cal. L. Rev. 1479, 1493-94 & n.70 (2001) (gathering and discussing cases). Other courts, including our own, have recognized that there might be instances when the probate exception applies in diversity actions involving

PDF No. 04-1544 In the Supreme Court of the United States

https://www.justice.gov › sites › default › files › osg › briefs › 2005 › 01 › 01 › 2004-1544.mer.ami.pdfPeter Nicolas, Fighting the ProbateMafia: A Dissection of the Probate Exception to Federal Court Jurisdiction, 74 S. Cal. L. Rev. 1479 (2001) ….. 17 1, 8 1 John Norton Pomeroy, A Treatise on Equity Jurisprudence as Administered in the United States of America (5th ed. 1941) ….. 17 John F. Winkler, The Probate Jurisdiction of the

ElderAbuseHelp.Org: *Washington D.C. Probate Mafia

https://elder-abuse-cyberray.blogspot.com › 2009 › 12 › washington-dc-probate-mafia.htmlWashington D.C. ProbateMafia; Reason for this Page. Studies estimate that 50% of elderly American are victims of financial exploitation while only 4% to 15% case are ever reported. Financial swindles are one of the fastest growing forms of abuse of the elderly according to NCEA.

Marshall v. Marshall :: 547 U.S. 293 (2006) :: Justia US …

https://supreme.justia.com › cases › federal › us › 547 › 293See generally Nicolas, Fighting the ProbateMafia: A Dissection of the Probate Exception to Federal Jurisdiction, 74 S. Cal. L. Rev. 1479 (2001).

Home [www.citizen4justice.com]

www.citizen4justice.com The elderly, disabled, those with compromised health, significant legal claims and families of the newly deceased worth 200k+, are being hunted by an operation I call. The Las Vegas Probate Mafia

In Search of the Probate Exception

https://scholarship.law.vanderbilt.edu › cgi › viewcontent.cgi?article=1240&context=vlrgenerally Peter Nicolas, Fighting the ProbateMafia: A Dissection of the Probate Exception to Federal Court Jurisdiction, 74 S. CAL. L. REV. 1479, 1503-14 (2001) (chronicling Chancery’s power over decedents’ trusts, fraud claims, suits seeking discovery, and the administration of estates to protect heirs, creditors, and legatees). 9.

Probate Lawyer – Mafia Universe Wiki

https://www.mafiauniverse.com › wiki › Probate_LawyerGeneral. The Probate Lawyer won’t actually receive the last wills. Since last will mechanics are unusual, the host must immediately contact any dead townies before posting the day start story if the setup isn’t open to prevent them from potentially talking with other dead players about the game. The deadline for submitting the last will will …

PDF The Seventh Circuit Turns a Blind Eye to the Playmate: The …

https://www.kentlaw.iit.edu › sites › ck › files › public › academics › jd › 7cr › v2-1 › nagler.pdfFighting the ProbateMafia: A Dissection of the Probate Exception to Federal Court Jurisdiction, 74 S. CAL. L. REV. 1479, 1482-1483 (2001) (discussing various policy justifications for the probate exception). SEVENTH CIRCUIT REVIEW Volume 2, Issue 1 Fall 2006 63 question cases is less certain.4 Given that the …

Why Probate Courts Consistently Fail Us-2019 – Aaapg

https://aaapg.net › why-probate-courts-consistently-fail-us-2019why probate courts consistently fail us For years I have written about the shortcomings in our equity legal system particularly in probate guardianship. Having just celebrated National Elder Abuse Awareness Week, this is a good time to recall what makes equity probate court and the guardianships it creates such an enormous disappointment and in …

Michelle Malkin: Blowing The Lid Off Probate Predators …

https://vdare.org › articles › michelle-malkin-blowing-the-lid-off-probate-predatorsMichelle Malkin: Blowing The Lid Off Probate Predators. There is a silent epidemic in this country claiming the lives and property of untold numbers of innocent elderly and disabled Americans. It has nothing to do with exotic viruses. In fact, it’s a homegrown phenomenon involving corrupt elected officials, judges and lawyers.

Marshall v. Marshall – Harvard University

https://h2o.law.harvard.edu › cases › 3320MARSHALL. v. MARSHALL. No. 04-1544. Supreme Court of United States. Argued February 28, 2006. Decided May 1, 2006. [298] Kent L. Richland argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the briefs were Dana Gardner Adelstein, Alan Diamond, Edward L. Xanders, and Philip W. Boesch, Jr.

A Prudential Exercise: Abstention and the Probate …

https://repository.law.umich.edu › cgi › viewcontent.cgi?article=1574&context=mlrMafia: A Dissection of the Probate Exception . to . Federal Court Jurisdiction, 74 S. CAL. L. REv. 1479, 1500 & n.113 (2001). 17. Markham, 326 U.S. at 494 (“[A] federal court has no jurisdiction to probate a will or

Blowing the Lid off Probate Predators – The New American

https://thenewamerican.com › blowing-the-lid-off-probate-predatorsThe allegation that Harris threatened Nina Simone’s family in the battle over her estate will be very familiar to other families who have faced similar intimidation 

Peter Nicolas | UW School of Law

https://www.law.uw.edu › directory › faculty › nicolas-peterPeter Nicolas, Fighting the ProbateMafia: A Dissection of the Probate Exception to Federal Court Jurisdiction, 74 S. Cal. L. Rev. 1479-1547 (2001). Peter Nicolas, The Use of Preclusion Doctrine, Antisuit Injunctions, and Forum Non Conveniens Dismissals in Transnational Intellectual Property Litigation, 40 Va. J. Int’l L. 331-404 (1999).

Michelle Malkin: Blowing the Lid Off Probate Predators …

https://www.cnsnews.com › commentary › michelle-malkin › michelle-malkin-blowing-lid-probate-predatorsThe family’s plight is still not over. Zurko’s assets have been liquidated by the conservators, and Lacy is saddled with $250,000 in legal bills. The allegation that Harris threatened Nina Simone’s family in the battle over her estate will be very familiar to other families who have faced similar intimidation by the Probate Predator Mafia.

Mexican Mafia hit focus of Pinal trial | Area News …

https://www.pinalcentral.com › casa_grande_dispatch › area_news › mexican-mafia-hit-focus-of-pinal-trial › article_9cf37e21-9e7b-542b-9854-0f903705cee4.htmlThe state labeled Armenta a “probate” of the Mexican Mafia at the time the letters were written. Parra explained the hierarchy of power that exists within the gang: starting with a single leader, followed by captains, lieutenants, sergeants and regular members.

Michelle Malkin: Blowing the Lid Off Probate Predators – AAAPG

https://aaapg.net › michelle-malkin-blowing-the-lid-off-probate-predatorsThe deadly disease running rampant in our court system is probate and guardianship abuse. This week, the granddaughter of the late iconic singer and songwriter Nina Simone blew the whistle on Vice President Kamala Harris’ alleged role in a scheme where the entertainer’s estate “was taken away from us” after she died in France in 2003.

PDF United States District Court Northern District of New York

files.constantcontact.com › 850d9fbc501 › 236a9c50-9fb6-4fb3-931f-d16cf4daab1d.pdf Fighting the ProbateMafia: A Dissection of the Probate Exception to Federal Court Jurisdiction, 74 S. Cal. L. Rev. 1479, 1500 (2001). 2 Because issues of probate fell outside the jurisdiction of those courts (probate of wills and the administration of estates were left to England’s

Estates, Probate, Nina Simone and Kamala Harris | GOPUSA

https://www.gopusa.com › estates-probate-nina-simone-and-kamala-harrisThe allegation that Harris threatened Nina Simone’s family in the battle over her estate will be very familiar to other families who have faced similar intimidation by the Probate Predator Mafia …


Data aggregation sources and leads: regional newspapers, VP Taskforce, AltrueSoft Tech Platforms, Citizen to Citizen Reporting, Citizen’s Bureau of InvestigationNorthwest Journal NewsGrassroots Elder Advocate Organizations, state & national GAO research monitoring & grant projects. Key search terms: § 18-1505, § 39-5302, Adult Protective Services, Dept. of Health, Elder Abuse and Exploitation. Aggregated & direct interviews via Citizen research and complaints focused on corruption, professional cronyism among state licensed service providers such as Estate Planning Attorneys, Doctors, Physicians, Clinicians & coordinated medical/neurocognitive/capacity evaluations, Conservator, Court Visitor, LSW, Guardian, Guardianship, Trustee, Management Services, IRPC, Idaho State Bar, CMS, Hospital, Facility ManagementSECFINRACode of Federal Regulations,Tax Fraud, Wealth Management Services, Certified Financial Forensics & CPA Investigation manuals, Uniform Code and many more industry compliance guidelines . Supported by research from over site sources, Bureau of Occupational Licenses and all State Statutes relevant to Negligence, Exploitation & Abuse including Probate Court monitoring, Senate Hearing on “Toxic Conservatorships“, recent federal legislation, Acts of Congress, Elder Justice ActElder Abuse Guide For Law Enforcement (EAGLE), American Bar Association & American Psychologists Association Resources on & Elder Abuse & Vulnerable Person Legislation.

Courtesy of Spokane; Washington, Sandpoint & Coeur d’alene; Kootenai County, Idaho Elder Abuse Advocates & Grassroots Networks.

Get It & Source It ‹ Corruption Maps — WordPress

VP Task Force ™ Crowd-sourced and AI Curated News Articles

Research Project Data  Source  Summary



PROJECT: Inland Northwest Vulnerable Person Rural Collusion Network. Current Project:  Kootenai & Bonner County, Idaho | Stevens & Spokane County Washington. Rural Area Collusion of Vulnerable Person Exploitation Project.

Public Safety; Vulnerable Adult Crowd-sourcing Geo Project 1: Kootenai, Bonner Counties of  North Idaho, District – Region 1.  Stevens & Spokane Counties  Eastern Washington – Coeur d’Alene area, Sandpoint area, Spokane Area  Coeur d’Alene,  Vulnerable Person Abuse, Neglect and Exploitation: Idaho: IC 18-1503, IC 39-5302  and/or IC 18-7803 Violations Research & Washington:  RCW 74.34.020 Violations Research.


Kootenai, Bonner, Spokane and Stevens County evidence indicates that several legal professionals acting in concert with their side guardianship services, conservator companies and informally affiliated colleagues in vulnerable adult service and legal professionals (estate planning, guardianship and conservator-ship law)  have a repeated 10 + year history of exploiting elders and vulnerable persons with physical and mental infirmities, these general incident details are outlined in Table 1.0.




Rural County Collusion Network Repeating Patterns.

Current investigation subject area:  North Idaho – Eastern Washington.

  1. For confirmation of findings with actual fact based evidence reference alleged perpetrators named in news articles, media announcement organizational chart,  Reference 3 core related estate cases with 6 additions supporting related cases, charts and perpetrator map legend content below.

Common patterns and primary connection in all  3 – 9 estates are:

  1. Vulnerable Persons have assets worth several million dollars,
  2. most VP’s are elderly women with either physical/cognitive impairments usually both,
  3. each has age or medical circumstance related to cognitive decline or combination of both as they undertook estate planning and was intentionally restricted access or isolated from trusted family members or friends,
  4. Undue influence factors intentionally placed upon victim by financially driven family member-primary caretaker
  5. each included in concert and/or collusion with white collar professional legal/medical and in some cases established felon criminals,
  6. Attorney, LSW and geriatric care physician and neurocognitive clinician malpractice.

     Additional repeating variables and repeating patterns include: Dependence, intentional, isolation/restriction on private access with trusted family member(so or friends by primary caretaker and permitted by attorney, new financial planning advisers and/or estate planning attorney, guardianship/consulting attorneys brought in prior to G/C petitions when VP first began suffering physical and cognitive diagnosis, new primary care or, geriatric care physicians, one or series of cognitive evaluation completed by  neurocognitive clinician completed without medical or  (against best practices) use of licensed social workers in collusion networks group for court visitor evaluations braising reports in doctors and clinics concealed and/biased cognitive evaluations and additions the LSW do not in driver court mate rails in family contentions or suspect financial matters and are repeating legal clients of attorneys operating in concert with suspect family member or caretaker, LSW or other individual in group also working in Dual role capacity as owners of geriatric service company while simultaneous employment  at health facility or hospital which allows them personal contact or knowledge of wealthy vulnerable person.   Estate planning attorney or financial, planning advisor also owning additional companies that they refer services of their vulnerable clients to their own or affiliated companies whom are also repeating clients of attorney as is the case of LSW an other geriatric evaluators; PCP physician & clinical Psychologist each whom were intentionally (concealment)  not disclosed prior physical and mental health diagnosis for their evaluative reports or court appointed declarations. In the medical profession these would business practices would be considered violations of the Stark Act.

Partial Research Findings Concerning Repeating Conflicts of Interest, Collusion, Bias,  Unethical Practices and Model Rule Violations. 

     Estate Planning Attorney are often Guardianship Attorneys and have established mutually beneficial cross relationships with other vulnerable person attorneys in the same region as well as established networks with specif geriatric care physicians or clinical psychiatrist(s) often use the same guardianship appointed visitor company which they motion for in VIP G/C petitions who refer VIP cases to their choice of guardianship company or fiduciary services company. At least one attorney also owns a fiduciary services company and each of the business entities use the same network of attorneys for litigation services. There is also documented court evidence that of a court appited geritric care phsysician intentionally concealing critical mental health diagnosis in in 5/2017 Physcians declaration. Several related cases also indicate physicians withholding medical diagniosis in physicians declarations and in one case the court pohysician gave a completly contray opinion to three other indepedant doctors review. The victim in this case estate went from #10 million dollars to under one million dollars in less than five years. Court record research indicats this has been ongong for at least 10 years. See perpertstot profiles to access witness accouts, recordings, esate documents and court documents for verification.


Levels 2 and 3 Research or Investigative Profiles May  Include:

  • Newsworthy public safety information,
  • Research and evidence on professional malpractice, 
  • IC 18-1505 or related violations,
  • IRS Circular 230 violations,
  • Federal Act violations,
  • Social Security Administration Title XVIII violations,
  • State Bar violations,
  • Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) violations,
  • Centers For Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) violations,
  • Idaho Bureau of Occupational Licenses (IBOL) violations,
  • IC 18-7803 violations,
  • FINRA and/or SEC violations,
  • FINCEN violations,
  • UPC, UTC, UPOA and/or TEDRA violations,
  • IRPC, IRCP, IRE and related violations,
  • Stark Act Violations,
  • “Alleged” civil/criminal activities and/or
  • Repeating patterns of collusion in relation to vulnerable person estate planning or guardianship matters,
  • Partial related case history of repeating unethical patterns,
  • Attorney, LSW or Physician’s side businesses in vulnerable person services (conflicts of interest),
  • Attorney’s associated business relationships in vulnerable person ligation and repeating network of associates involved in such litigation ,
  • Identification of collusion related to vulnerable person exploitation and negligence,

State Statute identification of documented evidence concerning moral turpitude

Important Idaho, Washington State & Federal Statues

Citizen’s Public Safety Network VP Task Force Educational Resources. 

Idaho, Washington Statues & Federal ACTs concerning Vulnerable Person Protection.

Idaho Statutes

I.C. § 18-1505(1), § 39-5302(7)

IC 39-5303, CMS and SSA Title 28  & SSA Subtitle B – Elder JusticeElder Mistreatment and The Elder Justice Act


Washington Statutes

Repeating ABA Model Rule Violations common in Vulnerable Person and Estate Planning and Guardians and Conservator Litigation:

Rule 1.1, Rule 1.7, Rule 1.8, Rule 1.10, Rule 1.14, Rule 1.15, Rule 1.16, Rule 4.1, Rule 4.2, Rule 4.3, Rule 4.4, Rule 7.1, Rule 8.1 and Rule 8.3.


IRS Circular 230; Section 10.5. See Table 2 Below & TEDRA Violations:

I.C § 15-8-103 (e), IC 5-219, IC 18-2403, IC 5-218


Legal protection Federal Statutes when Restricted Access at Hospitals and Eldercare Facilities.

Restricted Access of Vulnerable Person with Family at Kootenai Health or other regional Facilities and Hospitals.

Department of Health and Human Services – Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services: 42 CFR 482

Hospital and healthcare facility access and visitation

If you are being denied visitation to a loved one who is in a nursing home or hospital, this federal bill will help you in all 50 states.

42 CFR 482.13 – Condition of participation: Patient’s rights.

  • 482.13 Condition of participation: Patient‘s rights.

hospital must protect and promote each patient‘s rights.

(a)Standard: Notice of rights – (1) A hospital must inform each patient, or when appropriate, the patient‘s representative (as allowed under State law), of the patient‘s rights, in advance of furnishing or discontinuing patient care whenever possible.

Access and Visitation

The resident has the right and the facility must provide—subject to the resident’s right to deny or withdraw consent at any time—immediate access to any resident by:

  • Immediate family or other relatives of the resident. (42 C.F.R. §483.10(j)(1)(vii))
  • Others who are visiting with the consent of the resident, subject to reasonable restrictions. (42 C.F.R. §483.10(j)(1)(viii))
  • The facility must provide reasonable access to any resident by any entity or individual that provides health, social, legal or other services to the resident. (42 C.F.R. §483.10(j)(2))
  • If a resident is married, he or she and their spouse must be assured privacy and to be able to share a room if both are residents in the facility and both agree to do so.  (42 C.F.R. §483.10(e)(1)  and (m))

Data Curated by Corruption Maps – Publishing Newsworthy Public Safety Information.

Crowd-sourced and AI RSS Publication System; Data Gathered from Public Resources, Events,  News Articles and Advocate/Victim Witness Accounts of White-Collar Misdemeanor Infractions or Felonious that Often Results in re Irreparable Devastation to Vulnerable Persons. 


Citizen’s Public Safety Network – Vulnerable Person – VP Task Force:  White Collar Crime Tracking GEO API and Relational Database Social Technology Applications.


Person’s Submitting Evidence are Protected By Federal Whistleblower Protection Statutes In Conjunction With the US Constitution.

National, state and municipal white-collar civil, felony offences and corruption trends based on AI and crowd-sourced newsworthy public safety awareness sources. Information is  then cross-referenced with curated data of alleged or convicted perpetrator profiles. Information is based on historical and current crowd-sourced, advocate researcher and AI harvested news articles, national, state and local news events, and Geo API database resources. This platform uses the latest AI and open-source social technology platforms in combination with citizen public safety reporting systems and public domain data.  The sites GEO API maps layer and filter profiles and infractions to visually depict the trends of vulnerable person exploitation, domestic violence and inter-related vulnerable person crimes as each is a systemic societal epidemic;  crimes which often are perpetrated hand-in-hand with  professional malpractice, collusion and corruption pre-established in various urban and rural regional professionally affiliated networks.


One state example  of the  legal resources Law Enforcement can utilize to address the  repeating patterns of vulnerable person infractions and felonies  that consistently occur over a period of time by the same offenders with Federal and statutory civil and criminal violations occurring across county lines, State and even national borders.






18-7803.  DEFINITIONS. As used in this chapter, (a) “Racketeering” means any act which is chargeable or indictable under the following sections of the Idaho Code or which are equivalent acts chargeable or indictable as equivalent crimes under the laws of any other jurisdiction:

(1)  Homicide (section 18-4001, Idaho Code);

(2)  Robbery, burglary, theft, forgery, counterfeiting, and related crimes (sections 18-140118-140518-2403,18-240718-312318-312418-312518-360118-360218-360318-360518-360618-360718-360918-361018-361418-361518-463018-6501 and 49-518, Idaho Code);

(3)  Kidnapping (section 18-4501, Idaho Code);

(4)  Prostitution (sections 18-560118-560218-560318-560418-560518-560618-5608 and 18-5609, Idaho Code);

(5)  Arson (sections 18-80118-80218-80318-804 and 18-805, Idaho Code);

(6)  Assault (sections 18-908 and 18-4015, Idaho Code);

(7)  Lotteries and gambling (sections 18-380118-380218-380918-490218-490318-490418-490518-4906 and18-4908, Idaho Code);

(8)  Indecency and obscenity (sections 18-151518-151818-410318-4103A18-410418-410518-4105A and 18-4107, Idaho Code);

(9)  Poisoning (sections 18-4014 and 18-5501, Idaho Code);

(10) Fraudulent practices, false pretenses, insurance fraud, financial transaction card crimes and fraud generally (sections 18-240318-270618-300218-310118-312418-312518-312618-671341-29341-294 and41-1306, Idaho Code);

(11) Alcoholic beverages (sections 23-60223-60623-61023-70323-90523-91423-92823-934 and 23-938, Idaho Code);

(12) Cigarette taxes (sections 63-2505 and 63-2512(b), Idaho Code);

(13) Securities (sections 30-14-40130-14-40230-14-40330-14-40430-14-50130-14-50230-14-505 and 30-14-506, Idaho Code);

(14) Horseracing (section 54-2512, Idaho Code);

(15) Interest and usurious practices (sections 28-45-401 and 28-45-402, Idaho Code);

(16) Corporations (sections 18-190118-190218-190318-190418-190518-1906 and 30-1510, Idaho Code);

(17) Perjury (sections 18-5401 and 18-5410, Idaho Code);

(18) Bribery and corrupt influence (sections 18-1352 and 18-1353, Idaho Code);

(19) Controlled substances (sections 37-2732(a), (b), (c), (e) and (f), 37-2732B37-2734 and 37-2734B, Idaho Code);

(20) Motor vehicles (sections 49-22849-23149-232 and 49-518, Idaho Code);

(21) Terrorism (section 18-8103, Idaho Code).

(b)  “Person” means any individual or entity capable of holding a legal or beneficial interest in property;

(c)  “Enterprise” means any sole proprietorship, partnership, corporation, business, labor union, association or other legal entity or any group of individuals associated in fact although not a legal entity, and includes illicit as well as licit entities; and

(d)  “Pattern of racketeering activity” means engaging in at least two (2) incidents of racketeering conduct that have the same or similar intents, results, accomplices, victims or methods of commission, or otherwise are interrelated by distinguishing characteristics and are not isolated incidents, provided at least one (1) of such incidents occurred after the effective date of this act and that the last of such incidents occurred within five (5) years after a prior incident of racketeering conduct.


Report Perpetrator’s and Contact your Congressman’s office.


Please contact your Congressman’s office and State legislators to inform them how in-partitive that Vulnerable Persons and those assisting them need their attention and commitment to help the public citizens combat professional exploitation, negligence and malpractice. Vulnerable persons, especially dependent persons need to have have greater protection when perpetrators have ceased control of their free agency or when they the VP is  to afraid or deceived to understand their precarious circumstance.

These person are often unduly influenced, in fear,  denial or acquiesced to a state of perpetual submission and  learned helplessness in order to survive their abuser and those acting in concert with the exploiter to achieve their ambitions, These vulnerable victims  and  and those advocating for therm need  access to affordable resources to: 1) report their circumstance in a safe environment, 2) have their circumstances accurately vetted and objectively investigated on every side of the circumstances, not just the non-fact based accounts or fictitious projections of the current persons  whom have insidiously usurped control of their affairs and confidential relations. 

It is often best to contact political offices supported by the public taxpayer to ensure thier public safety  in writing and send a copy of your letters to Vulnerable PErson Advocacy groups limke the Citizen’s Public Safety Network.


Abuse, Negligence, Exploitation, Malpractice: 

“See It, Lot It, Blog It, Post It, Share It,  Map It, . . . STOP IT! 


Data Curated by Corruption Maps – Publishing Newsworthy Public Safety Information.

Crowd-sourced and AI RSS Publication System; Data Gathered from Public Resources, Events,  News Articles and Advocate/Victim Witness Accounts of White-Collar Misdemeanor Infractions or Felonious that Often Results in Irreparable Devastation to Vulnerable Persons. 


Citizen’s Public Safety Network – Vulnerable Person – VP Task Force :  White Collar Crime Tracking GEO API and Relational Database Social Technology Applications.



Coeur D’Alene, Kootenai County, Idaho Elder Abuse VP Task Force ™ Article

Public Safety Tools – IRS Circular 230 Malpractice Protection.

Cautionary Estate Planning Educational Alerts – Article Excerpt:

Illicit Estate Planning Attorney Strategies, their Physically/Cognitively Impaired Dependent Elderly Clients & IRS Circular 230 Regulations.

Qualitative Research Report Results for Regional Blog & Education Publication Series:

Inland North West Research Summary Articles from the NW VP Collusion Project.

Estate Planning Attorneys are required to follow the IRS Circular 230 regulations if they do not they can be suspended from practice.  if they are exploiting, manipulating their client or aware of others doing this or even isolating their clients and substituting their intentions for the long-held intentions of their clients this would be an IRS circular 230 violations and should be reported to the State Bar and IRS office of professional responsibility.

The IRS circular 230 notice is important for the fiduciaries to be aware of since it holds additional Estate Planning and Accountant accountability mechanisms beyond those of the Statutory Laws, State Bar Model Rules and Court procedures that are useful so the fiduciaries  can have a means to stress the importance of following 1) the treasury regulations (and aforementioned & attached) and 2) that best practices are involved for those estate planners drafting the estate and implementing tax strategies. Specifically when benefactor has facts been substantially misrepresented (fraud) has been coercively pressured (undue influence), under gone recent physical and mental emergencies resulting in dependence due to physical and cognitive impairments, and in some cases intentionally restricted private access all while estate planning and transferring substantial assets to new confidential relations (new caretaker, POA, Trustee/Fiduciary Landlord, Doctor, Friend and/or attorney) contrary to long established “natural disposition” to many damaging scenarios including the automatic migration and substantial negative tax consequences in sue we can use the following information “preemptively” to ensure that both the Grantors and the beneficiaries best interests are of paramount importance in the ongoing estate planning process and for all the required ongoing reporting and tax filing.



When the following  circumstances occur  then in additional State bar Model Rule violations  IRS circular 230 violations specifically apply:

IRS-Treasury Department Circular 230 Violations (examples of repeating IRS Circular violations among many other State Bar, Federal act act and statutory vulnerable person laws  can be reviewed with password access regarding a 2016 Kooenai County Guardianship Case estate matter of a wealthy physically and cognitively impaired elderly woman.

IRS Circular 230 Section 10.50: Sanctions

Under §10.50, after notice and an opportunity to be heard, a practitioner may be censured (publicly reprimanded), suspended, or disbarred from practice before the IRS for incompetence, disreputable conduct (see the discussion of §10.51 below), failure to comply with Circular 230 regulations (§10.52), or intent to defraud or knowingly mislead or threaten a client or prospective client.

The third part of Circular 230 allows sanctions for violation of the Regulations. The Director of the IRS’s Office of Professional Responsibility (OPRS), after notice and an opportunity for a proceeding, may censure, suspend, or disbar any practitioner from practice before the Internal Revenue Service for the following:

  • The practitioner is incompetent or disreputable;
  • The practitioner fails to comply with Circular 230; or
  • The practitioner, with intent to defraud, willfully and knowingly misleads or threatens a client or prospective client.
  • Any discipline from the IRS is public and the IRS swill notify the practitioner’s professional association, such as a state bar association.

Learn more at:



Additional Circular 230, Uniform Probate Code, TEDRA (ID, WA, OR), Federal Act, Statutory  AND ABA Model Rule violations include:

  • Aurelio to plan for, or the intentional disregard for negative tax consequences for elderly clients on the nature of “Majority-ruled” revocable and amendable Trusts when Trustees are also beneficiaries whom can control the Trusts asset disposition,
  • the negative tax consequences, possible risk of asset seizure with having a foreigner on a domestic/US Trust
  • Fraudulent clandestine Trust amendments that shift substantial Trust assets to “majority-ruling” Trustee-beneficiaries when benefactor has suffered recent physical health and cognitive impairments and
  • Deception plan by tax strategist-estate planning Attorney recommending a TEDRA agreement to be signed by all Trustee-beneficiaries except the benefactor (physical and cognitively impaired 82 year old woman) to lock in previous illicitly gained Trust asset disposition shifts to the majority-ruling Trustee-beneficiaries. Tax strategist – estate planning attorney states not to have the benefactor (Trust Grantor/owner of the assets) not  sign the agreement so not to arouse scrutiny of the IRS. One reason would be because Trust in its formation and due to circumstances was in violation of numerous Federal Acts, State Laws. IRS Circular 230. ABA Model Rules.  Uniform Trust & Probate Codes.